|
As many business owners can attest
to, injuries in the workplace can have many residual effects. In a recent article written by Frank Pennachio
in Insurance Journal, the issues and concerns of safety in the
workplace are addressed. Not only do injuries in the
workplace affect medical costs, but they also have a direct
effect on Workers Compensation premiums. If we can
minimize the amount of injuries in the workplace then we can
begin to chip away at the inflated Workers Compensation
premiums. The following article written by Frank Pennachio
published in Insurance Journal on July 19, 2004, takes a
closer look at what employment practices should be enforced to
minimize injuries in the workplace. Frank Pennachio is
the curriculum director for the Institute of WorkComp
Advisors.
Worker's Comp Loss
Prevention, Going Beyond the Safety Dance
You work hard, yet you're
frustrated. Why are you still suffering from employee injury
problems and escalating workers' compensation insurance cost
regardless of your efforts?
So, is the solution to do like
what is always done? Respond to workplace injuries by beefing
up loss prevention programs? Should management finally get
serious and committed about safety? Should committees be
formed? Is it time for more meetings and additional training?
And, is now the time to add incentive programs to the mix?
So you do all that, yet
injuries continue to occur and getting your employees
productive again has become more and more of a headache (and
heartache, too).
Recent studies have shown that
the total number of workplace injuries is trending downward.
However, the total direct cost of workplace injuries is still
going up. Fewer employees are getting hurt, but those getting
hurt are costing much more.
Safety programs and training
are necessary and vital to a healthy and productive workplace.
However, safety programs alone will not get the job done in
reducing workplace injuries, malingering claim problems and
the overall total cost of injuries.
Employers intuitively sense
there must be something more that is driving this cost and
aggravation. Ask any business owner about one of their most
aggravating workers' comp claims, and it is unlikely they will
talk about "how their safety program failed." You
will probably get an earful about the character of the
employee, the abuse of the system, and maybe even a word or
two about doctors, attorneys and insurance company personnel.
However, the solutions that
keep coming their way from insurance companies and agents are
often wrapped in a safety program package. Yes, it's necessary
but far from sufficient.
Graduates of the Institute of
Work Comp Advisors have learned to focus on two areas in
addition to safety. The first is the hiring process and the
second is the steps to take before and after an injury occurs.
Many employers are confused
about what they can and cannot do during the hiring process to
prevent problem claims from occurring. The Americans with
Disabilities Act does not allow you to ask questions about
disability or use medical examinations until after you make
someone a conditional job offer. However, after making a job
offer, you may ask any disability-related questions and
conduct medical examinations as long as you do this for
everybody in the same job category.
It is critical for employers to
integrate in their hiring process two powerful hiring forms:
the Conditional Offer of Employment and the Post-Offer,
Pre-Placement Medical History Questionnaire.
Just as the name indicates, the
Conditional Offer of Employment makes the job offer
conditional upon the employee being able to perform the
essential functions of the job and would not pose a direct
threat (i.e., a significant risk of substantial harm) to the
health or safety of themselves or others. The offer may be
withdrawn, if in medical opinion, the employee poses such a
threat with reasonable accommodation.
Once the Conditional Offer is
in place and before work begins, the employee should complete
the Medical History Questionnaire. Some employers direct the
employee to their local medical clinic to have the form
completed with the assistance of a doctor, nurse or
physician's assistant.
Assuming the employee is
truthful, the medical history information will go a long way
to determine if the employee is fit for the job. Sometimes, an
additional examination may be needed.
This process is in the best
interest of all concerned. The employer, employee and the
employee's family all lose if an employee is placed in a job
for which they are not fit. Injury or re-injury of a
pre-existing condition is likely to happen if the employee is
not suited for the job.
But, what if the prospective
employee lies on the Medical History Questionnaire? At least
you will have a record of the misrepresentation, which may be
helpful during a future claims battle.
The second area of focus, in
addition to safety and the hiring process, is the pre- and
post-injury process. Many employers don't know the steps to
take before and after an injury occurs. Most will just hand
off the responsibility of the injured employee to the
insurance company. They simply forward a Notice of First
Injury by phone, fax or e-mail to the insurance company and
tell themselves, "I pay my premiums, accidents happen,
and it's their job to take care of this."
Employers will reap huge
benefits by taking a more active role in the claims process.
They can take the following steps before an injury occurs:
• Train employees on how and
when to report injuries.
• Select an employee to act as a Back-On-The-Job
Coordinator.
• Implement a Back-On-The-Job Program.
• Establish a relationship with the local medical clinic and
educate their staff on your philosophy about returning
employees to work in modified jobs if necessary.
After the injury occurs, the Back-On-The-Job Coordinator must
spring into action with a clearly defined plan of action.
Caring and communication with all parties is the key. Most
important is not to let the employee feel lost, isolated,
confused or afraid. Many employees turn to attorneys for help
because no one else will talk with them.
We recognize that some
employees will go to an attorney before the "ink" is
dry on the accident report. But, those employees account for
less than 5 percent of all injured employees. Yet, the other
95 percent of injured employees often get treated with
suspicion and blame which can trigger exaggeration and
malingering.
It is clear that getting an
employee back to work as soon as medically appropriate is
critical. This will involve educating supervisors on the need
to accommodate injured employees in transitional modified duty
assignments. A positive and cooperative attitude of the
injured employee's supervisor sets the stage for a faster
recovery to full duty and productivity.
The medical community needs to
be brought onboard as an ally in assisting the employee and
the employer. Most doctors have not been trained in disability
management, or as we prefer to call it, ability management.
Doctors will agree that returning an employee to the workplace
is good therapy and the employee will heal faster if they
remain active even if on a modified status.
Doctors that have been surveyed
complain that they lack the necessary information to return
the employee to work. They are not usually aware of the
employer's interest or ability to create modified duty
assignments.
An injured employee's initial
visit to a doctor usually puts the employee in front of the
doctor for six to ten minutes. Asking a doctor to diagnose and
create a treatment plan as well as formulate an ability
management plan is a lot to ask in that short amount of time.
Advanced planning and communication with the medical community
is essential to assisting the employee.
Employers should have an active
safety program but should also be encouraged to go beyond a
safety emphasis. Getting the right employees that are fit for
the job will prevent injuries. You can have the best safety
program ever created, but if the employee is not fit for the
job, they will get hurt.
And, when your safety program
and hiring process fails and an employee gets injured, the
employer must take an active role. It is no knock on the
insurance companies to suggest they can't get the results you
want alone. Only the employer, employee, supervisors and the
medical community working together will bring the best
results.
|